Do you think that the Nahua metaphysical concept of Teotl is really a form of dialectical polar monism? Is it fair to give such concepts western labels when they were developed using a different way of thinking?

(Explanations here and here.)

Yeah, the label seems to fit pretty well to me. I haven’t heard a substantive reason why it wouldn’t fit, so unless I’m missing something, the idea that this is somehow untranslatable into modern philosophical concepts sounds like sort of a dodge. Or if not a dodge, then evidence that the whole concept didn’t make a tremendous amount of sense in the first place.

Advertisements

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: